Skip to main content

Discussion with Alan Parker -- 2

Posted below is the email I sent back to Dr. Parker, VP for Evangelism for Amazing Facts. We are continuing the discussion about Adventist Evangelism and Amazing Facts' role in that.

Dr. Parker,

Thanks for the thoughtful response and an inside look at Amazing Facts. I would love to a be fly on the wall when you and Doug Batchelor are going at it over some texts. I know it's gracious and no chairs are thrown but I'm sure it gets interesting.

I'll tell you, I don't really know what to think. Either I am dead wrong about A.F. and they are much more balanced than I thought, or you represent the "softer" side of A.F. I would imagine that it's a bit of both and I've heard from several people that they really respect you and think you are helping provide a more healthy balance that might have been missing in the past. I really have little response to your answers because they were answered so well. I applaud A.F. for the extensive work they do with the Bible Studies and prayer and is a much needed ministry of the church.

As I read through your email, I came to realize that my "gripe" isn't necessarily completely with A.F. I realized that while it is a ministry, it also is a business. A.F. exhibits good business practices by targeting specific groups and making sure their material is the best possible at reaching that kind of person. If A.F. tried to make material targeted at Youth or those who have been affected and embrace aspects of postmodernism, they probably wouldn't sell much. I guess my problem is with the church which tends to define a traditional Adventist evangelistic series as the gold standard of evangelism. Small groups, food banks, health fairs, etc are great programs but it's not evangelism unless it ends up with a preaching series full of beasts, visions, and the Sabbath.

With that being said, I wish A.F. would leverage some of their influence in evangelism and try to promote other methods of evangelism. As you shared, your material is most effective at reaching Christians and I would also guess an older, modernist crowd. As I asked on my blog: Is converting a Baptist truly evangelism? I'm not against it, but I certainly don't think it should be our target. The reality is that a preaching series lasting a month or more and the Bible Study lessons are not going to reach the unchurched and so different methods are needed. These methods aren't money-makers and can't be duplicated on a large scale so business-wise, it would be terrible for A.F. However, I still wish A.F. would "take one for the team" and maybe get the discussion rolling and start the brainstorming.

With that being said, I do have a few concerns about the content of the A.F. lessons that maybe you can respond to. You've been proving my suspicions wrong about A.F. so hopefully I'm wrong about these as well.

1. I don't find them to be the most Christ-centered lessons. They aren't completely devoid of Christ but they tend to focus on the Adventist distinctives more than on who God and Jesus is. I'm worried about an Adventist tendency to say that the rest of the evangelical world has Jesus but we have more to offer. I'm scared we've lost Jesus in the midst of preaching the distinctives. Why doesn't A.F have several lessons in the set of 27 just focusing on Jesus and God? I'm not saying the other specific lessons don't tell us about God but I think focused attention, aside from the prophecies, is helpful.

2. They call for a mental commitment to doctrines but not much social action. It feels like the only social action called for is to take off jewelry which is debatable as to whether it is a social action. What about the need to help the poor and needy, forgive others, love enemies, and live sacrificial lives? I know there are hints throughout but it is so heavy on the cognitive level that I think those challenges end up getting lost in the bigger picture of prophecy. Is telling people how the world will end all we have to offer or do we have instruction on how their true lives can begin?

3. What happened to the Biblical narratives? I think one of the things they're missing is the stories of the Bible which really connect with people and then provide an opportunity to call people to join the story of how God's working in the world today. The lessons are what I call "proof-text heaven." Texts are given with no regard to their context and I believe the student ends up getting a scattered look at the Bible and not an in-depth one. Does this really provide someone with a good understanding of the Bible or do they end up dependent on pastors and A.F. to tell them what to believe because they just know a text here and a text there?

Again, thanks for taking the time to do this. I'm enjoying the discussion and hope you are too.


David Hamstra said…
I would formulate your first question differently: Why aren't the doctrines and prophecies taught in a way that shows who Jesus is? Shouldn't Christ be explicitly at the center of each doctrine? Isn't he the focus of all prophecy?

This is not a question I put just to Amazing Facts but to my church in general and to myself.
Anonymous said…
Those are good questions, things that I've been wondering silently for quite some time. I look forward to the responses.
Nice job Trevan. After reading through both of these post I find myself wondering: If this is AF who have I been bumping into while growing up in Sacramento. So much of what Dr. Parker spoke about contradicts my own experiences with AF. I am grateful to have this new experience to temper and balance what I have encountered in the past.

One aspect of Dr. Parker's response I found myself mulling over a great deal was his views on evangelism and postmodernism. It seemed to me that he was indicating that in order for someone to be effectively evangelized they would need to abandon a postmodern world view. I am probably missing something, but it appeared that he believed God is bound to the categories of modernism and impotent in the face of relativism, which would seem to contradict early church history. I am not sure I believe that. In fact I think the reaction to modernism may have helped us rediscover the biblical narrative and therefore breathe new life into contemporary biblical encounters.

I also would like to know if AF has considered what might happen to our churches and their organization if (when?) there aren't anymore Christians to convert to our church? It is a well documented observation that Christianity in North America, despite the rise of Mega-Churches, is in decline. So what happens then? Can we afford to wait for postmodernists to come back to modern foundationalism?

Loving the posts and the respectful dialogue. Thank Dr. Parker for me.
Anonymous said…
Hey Trevan, you are doing an excellent job. Dont give up until you get to the bottom of the whole issue. God bless!

Popular posts from this blog

The Advent Struggle -- Part 2

There's been a lot of excellent discussion on the previous post. I've stayed out of it for the most part to let everyone else let their thoughts be known. I thought I would write another post explaining my thoughts in a little more detail. There has been some discussion over this issue of style versus theology (At least at the very beginning). I think I might have used that terminology and I want to clarify that I reject the false dichotomy of style VERSUS theology because our style and methodologies REVEAL our theology. The methods we use to present a message tends to reveal as much about the message as the message itself. In no way do I believe that all young adults want praise music, full band, nice lyric graphics projected, etc. However, I think that the 90% (no real data just a guesstimate) of Adventist churches who think of that worship style as being from the devil reveals one of the major issues at the heart of the crisis -- The Adventist response to culture. The tradit

The Advent Struggle

I've been trying to write this for literally a month but haven't been able to. Not sure why but it just hasn't flowed. So, here's the attempt: On a regular basis, I hear from or about friends who have stopped going to church. There are numerous reasons why they are leaving but one common thread seems to be a feeling that church has become meaningless. They've felt this for a long time but kept going because they hoped it would get better or just because they'd feel guilty if they didn't. But, they aren't going to play the game anymore. The young adult exodus out of the church isn't news to really anyone but there's something important that I think will make this crisis be more severe. When you examine recent Adventist history, there have been several crises of faith including EGW and Inspiration, Desmond Ford, and Creation/Science (to a small degree). What are the characteristics of all of them? 1. They are based on a doctrinal position and are v

A Jehovah's Witness Connection

This morning I was enjoying last night's episode of "The Daily Show" (THANK YOU TIVO!) when the doorbell rang. I couldn't figure out who it was through the peephole but I decided to answer the door anyways. A man had a little pamphlet which he gave me and asked me to read it and left. No pressure, just leaving it with me. So, who was it? My initial reaction was that it must be a Jehovah's Witness but I've found most of them are much more confrontational and never just leave something in your hand without arguing over something. I began to think it might have been an Adventist. Well, what did the pamphlet look like and what did it talk about? The front declared, "The End of False Religion is Near!" Inside it described false religions as those that meddle in war and politics, spread false doctrine, and tolerate immoral sex. On the next page, what did I see but decpictions of scary beasts and the scarlet woman of Revealtion. The text describes how false